PART VII: POSITION
7.1 Aristotle
Inherited: the rational structure of reality, the four causes, moderate realism, the empirical orientation, inference as truth-preserving.
Departures: the placement of the human telos inside this life (3.3), and the incorporation of theology. The precise form of the second: Aristotle’s god does not know particulars, will anything, or ground truth, so it cannot do the work required here. Book Lambda is theology, but not this theology.
7.2 Aquinas
Inherited, and more than is usually credited: mediated realism, moderate realism about universals, the convertibility of the transcendentals, participation, God outside time, and the empirical orientation. Aquinas built the Summa on Aristotle’s method against the Augustinian Platonists. Acceptance of empirical evidence is not the break.
Departures:
Divine simplicity, rejected by voliscience (6.5, 6.7).
Forms in the divine intellect prior to creation, rejected by the instantiation criterion (1.4).
Unconstrained by magisterial commitment. Aquinas reasoned inside a doctrinal envelope and built accommodations where his conclusions could not land inside it. Divine simplicity is the case in point: not a scriptural datum, a philosophical construction that then constrained everything downstream about God’s knowledge and will. This is a difference in method, not in sect, and it connects to the project’s central theme, since dogmatic commitment is a restriction imported as a discovery.
The unity of the departures. Both refuse to grant reality to what exists only in an intellect. That shared principle is what makes this a system rather than two adjustments, and it should be stated as such.
7.3 The surplus
What this metaphysics can ground that Thomism cannot:
The Triveritas. A formalized three-filter criterion with a probability measure, an inequality chain, independence proved by existence proof, and an explicit statement of what it fails to establish. Aquinas had no probability theory, so this was not merely unthought but unformalizable.
Voliscience, against a rigid predetermined divine plan.
The amphiboly diagnostic. A method rather than a thesis, applied uniformly across problems the literature treats as unrelated. Not available before the restriction it diagnoses existed.
The not-truth asymmetry as an operating principle (5.3).
The register vocabulary which the tradition did not need and the modern debate does.
Calibration. The criterion is built against empirical data about how inquiry fails at scale: the replication crisis, peer review certifying parodies, fifty-seven years of an unexamined derivation. That evidence was not available before it existed.