It's not quite right, but you can almost map L, M and E to the trio.
While a pretty good case can be made for E being Beauty...
Well, it's a bit of fun nonsense, entertaining to consider.
More practically a combination of the Triveritas and discernment, sense, for the Good, Beautiful and True will be of good use.
The Triveritas does stop, just not arbitrarily after all.
All three talons of the Triveritas are beautiful, but that beauty is only true when good. A good beautiful and true claw!
Wanting to put the Triveritas to evil ends is somewhat complicated by it's nature.
We've a long history of the individual parts being perverted, and doubtless this wonderful tool shall not prove different in the end, turned to some foul purpose and mockery of itself...
But at least, structurally it's quite resistant.
Admittedly some people have no understanding of L, M or E.
The age-old, but not so well-recognized, "Law of Three," as it has been called. One interesting example is Communism, Capitalism, "National Socialism," with the latter being saddled with a perhaps unfortunate moniker.
Consider as well, the ancient Chinese Lou Shu Diagram, a depiction of the old 3x3 magic square of Saturn, which they presented with black and white "dot numerals," apparently enshrining the concept of Yin vs Yang, thus unleashing false dichotomies upon mankind because they ignored (or hid) the idea of the Trine
Numbers, which are as important as the Even and the Odd numbers, which set consists of two Odd and one Even number: 3 and 9, and 6.
Redraw the Lou Shou to show this, and solve a world of problems@
Maybe I'm missing something, but I think the weakness of the system is E. The interpretation of the evidence is often more important than the evidence itself. Which is why appeals to authority, such as peer-review, are used to resolve disputes. Unfortunately, peer-review is broken and the authority deciding the "truth" of modern science is completely fake and gay. Using L and M to help interpret E is the right idea, but maybe it's not enough.
You are missing something. E is absolutely necessary. L and M do not "interpret" E. And it is often E that demonstrates flaws that L and M are hiding.
Dishonesty can be utilized to misrepresent any dimension, just look at the amphibolies in Ricardo's logic or Kimura's derivation of the substitution equation.
E is less conclusive in the affirmative, but it is no less decisive, because one counterexample is sufficient to negate E.
Triveritas looks like the rule of "True, good and beautiful' dressed in a space marine suit ready to kick some serious ass.
It's not quite right, but you can almost map L, M and E to the trio.
While a pretty good case can be made for E being Beauty...
Well, it's a bit of fun nonsense, entertaining to consider.
More practically a combination of the Triveritas and discernment, sense, for the Good, Beautiful and True will be of good use.
The Triveritas does stop, just not arbitrarily after all.
All three talons of the Triveritas are beautiful, but that beauty is only true when good. A good beautiful and true claw!
Wanting to put the Triveritas to evil ends is somewhat complicated by it's nature.
We've a long history of the individual parts being perverted, and doubtless this wonderful tool shall not prove different in the end, turned to some foul purpose and mockery of itself...
But at least, structurally it's quite resistant.
Admittedly some people have no understanding of L, M or E.
The more I read about this the more I'm convinced the application will be found not primarily in philosophy but natural philosophy.
If the world is not scheduled to end in the next fifty years, Vox Day may be remembered as the man who replaced Bacon's scientific method.
imagine ordering "Sigma game" in leather and before it arrives the world ends, it would be a serious bummer.
The age-old, but not so well-recognized, "Law of Three," as it has been called. One interesting example is Communism, Capitalism, "National Socialism," with the latter being saddled with a perhaps unfortunate moniker.
Consider as well, the ancient Chinese Lou Shu Diagram, a depiction of the old 3x3 magic square of Saturn, which they presented with black and white "dot numerals," apparently enshrining the concept of Yin vs Yang, thus unleashing false dichotomies upon mankind because they ignored (or hid) the idea of the Trine
Numbers, which are as important as the Even and the Odd numbers, which set consists of two Odd and one Even number: 3 and 9, and 6.
Redraw the Lou Shou to show this, and solve a world of problems@
Anyhow, thanks Vox.
Maybe I'm missing something, but I think the weakness of the system is E. The interpretation of the evidence is often more important than the evidence itself. Which is why appeals to authority, such as peer-review, are used to resolve disputes. Unfortunately, peer-review is broken and the authority deciding the "truth" of modern science is completely fake and gay. Using L and M to help interpret E is the right idea, but maybe it's not enough.
You are missing something. E is absolutely necessary. L and M do not "interpret" E. And it is often E that demonstrates flaws that L and M are hiding.
Dishonesty can be utilized to misrepresent any dimension, just look at the amphibolies in Ricardo's logic or Kimura's derivation of the substitution equation.
E is less conclusive in the affirmative, but it is no less decisive, because one counterexample is sufficient to negate E.