An exceptionally useful point, especially if one remembers what a paradox actually is.
Actual disharmony or a vague sense of dissonance is prime launching target for investigating a particular, to find a particular fracture point or avoid installing a weakness.
Triveritas is very nicely tuned for evaluation of harmonics. Nice!
Of course while dangerous, a person of greater qualities needs fewer puzzle pieces to make sense, but hunting the trails of dissonance and harmony should allow people to punch above their weight on occasion.
Sense made, the evaluation can not only be under triveritas scrutiny but continually compared to the nature of other passing points of data.
This potentially allows items that are unrelated at first glance to still have use compared to each other.
If something hasn't the "shape" of Truth, then within or without there's something amiss, even if it's just a error of judgement or merely an underbaked comprehension.
The usual wariness applies, but even without the rigour of the full methods Vox is developing, following harmonics alone will give decent legs.
5.2 I think both partialities can be used, as mixtures and fragments share a fractal relationship. Mixtures are fragments of a larger whole, and fragments are mixtures in miniature. Atoms < metals < components < cars < traffic etc. Every layer is approached as a mixture of fragments. Every layer must be rigorously tested for conformity to truth as contamination leads to bad metallurgy leads to weak bolts leads to an axle coming off the car during rush hour.
Hi Vox! You’re really cooking with all this Veriphysics! A sigma friend and I have been following your content for almost a decade and we’ve been looking into Veriphysics as an exciting turn in the post-closed philosophical canon. Something you might appreciate and I would certainly appreciate your thoughts on, is a Gettier problem solution I have written that uses Christian metaphysics to solve the problem and prevent any Gettier Luck unlike every other solution. I would very much appreciate your feedback sir and I thank you: for if you hadn’t written about the SSH and other topics, philosophy wouldn’t have looked so appealing so as to participate myself! Thank you for all you do and here is the paper! https://substack.com/@iconoclasticclub/note/p-211275828?r=4k3ogu&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
"True elements are harmonious"
An exceptionally useful point, especially if one remembers what a paradox actually is.
Actual disharmony or a vague sense of dissonance is prime launching target for investigating a particular, to find a particular fracture point or avoid installing a weakness.
Triveritas is very nicely tuned for evaluation of harmonics. Nice!
Of course while dangerous, a person of greater qualities needs fewer puzzle pieces to make sense, but hunting the trails of dissonance and harmony should allow people to punch above their weight on occasion.
Sense made, the evaluation can not only be under triveritas scrutiny but continually compared to the nature of other passing points of data.
This potentially allows items that are unrelated at first glance to still have use compared to each other.
If something hasn't the "shape" of Truth, then within or without there's something amiss, even if it's just a error of judgement or merely an underbaked comprehension.
The usual wariness applies, but even without the rigour of the full methods Vox is developing, following harmonics alone will give decent legs.
This commenter always enjoys the posts of this teller.
Loving this series.
Looks like the last sentence got snipped prematurely.
Fixed, thanks.
5.2 I think both partialities can be used, as mixtures and fragments share a fractal relationship. Mixtures are fragments of a larger whole, and fragments are mixtures in miniature. Atoms < metals < components < cars < traffic etc. Every layer is approached as a mixture of fragments. Every layer must be rigorously tested for conformity to truth as contamination leads to bad metallurgy leads to weak bolts leads to an axle coming off the car during rush hour.
Hi Vox! You’re really cooking with all this Veriphysics! A sigma friend and I have been following your content for almost a decade and we’ve been looking into Veriphysics as an exciting turn in the post-closed philosophical canon. Something you might appreciate and I would certainly appreciate your thoughts on, is a Gettier problem solution I have written that uses Christian metaphysics to solve the problem and prevent any Gettier Luck unlike every other solution. I would very much appreciate your feedback sir and I thank you: for if you hadn’t written about the SSH and other topics, philosophy wouldn’t have looked so appealing so as to participate myself! Thank you for all you do and here is the paper! https://substack.com/@iconoclasticclub/note/p-211275828?r=4k3ogu&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action